US
: According to European wireless analyst Emma McClune, early consumer
3G launches are a dangerous marketing trend in the wireless market.
Eighteen month and two-year contracts are back in fashion, demonstrating
the industry’s painful realization that consumer loyalty in
the wireless market is at an all-time low.
New consumer 3G
launches seek to lock consumers into long-term contracts in exchange
for cheap handsets, driving customer acquisition costs to new heights
In her new report
entitled ‘Loyalty versus Lock-in’, McClune warns operators
of the dangers of attempting to fetter the whimsical consumer market
without a renewed focus on service innovation. “Lock-in could
be the dog that returns to bite the wireless industry.”
McClune states
“Operators are wrong to think the loyalty problem stops right
there, or that they’ve solved the riddle of consumer infidelity
entirely. A locked-in base of unhappy customers will certainly churn
at the end of a contractual term, and unless operators continue to
add value for their longer contract customers, they will loose them.
Having bound 3G customers to them, operators must now endeavour to
be loveable. If there was no brand loyalty at the beginning of the
contractual relationship, operators have to ensure there is by the
end.”
“The focus
must return to services. Operators must treat their longer term subscribers
as VIPs, giving them ‘gold’ status privileges and treatment.
Longer term subscribers deserve a better class of customer support,
priority provision of new services and promotions and incentives to
re-subscribe. All this won’t be cheap, but then the prospect
of mass 3G churn in the mid- term is a sobering thought.”
Addressing operators’
market strategies, McClune affirms “Having locked the customer
in, operators should look to remove other barriers which limit consumer
freedom of choice. Operators should open up their walled gardens of
content to outside provider, since the real threat of extraneous content
to operators’ existing content revenues is, in fact, quite minimal.
In terms of data revenues, content is still struggling to make its
mark, and at this stage in the market it is more important to drive
usage of mobile content – any mobile content – than to
monopolize, and potentially stunt, users’ tiny mobile content
spend. Users may accept a longer contract in exchange for a cheap
handset deal, but a limited walled garden of content comes with no
redeeming benefits.”